Intracoronary thrombolysis facilitated primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract Background Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the standard reperfusion treatment in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, PPCI often complicated by microvascular obstruction. Intracoronary thrombolysis (ICT) may mitigate thrombotic burden. Methods We conducted, according to PRISMA statement, largest meta-analysis of ICT as adjuvant therapy PPCI. All relevant studies were identified searching PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web Science, with no time or language restriction. The odds ratio (OR) mean difference (MD) a 95% confidence interval (CI) calculated. Studies included STEMI patients undergoing receiving ICT. Both safety efficacy outcomes analyzed. Data combined using random-effects model. Results Thirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving total 1876 (1014 ICT) included. Compared control group, could reduce incidence major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (OR 0.65, CI, 0.48–0.86, P=0.003) improve 6 months left ventricular ejection fraction (MD 3.78, 1.53–6.02, P=0.0010). Indices enhanced microcirculation more common [Post PCI corrected (TIMI) frame count −3.57; −5.00 −2.14, P<0.00001); blush grade (MBG) 2/3 1.76; 1.16–2.69, P=0.008), complete resolution 1.97; 1.33–2.91, P=0.0007). rate bleeding was comparable between 2 groups 1.27; 0.61–2.63, P=0.53). Conclusions associated improved MACE PPCI, without any significant increase bleeding. Our suggests that targeted safe potentially effective Nonetheless, above results necessitate verification contemporary large RCT. Funding Acknowledgement Type funding sources: None.
منابع مشابه
Contemporary mortality differences between primary percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombolysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
BACKGROUND Current ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction guidelines regarding reperfusion strategy are based on trials conducted before the application of routine invasive evaluation after thrombolysis. Modern thrombolysis may affect the previously observed mortality difference between primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) and thrombolysis. METHODS In-hospital mortality was p...
متن کاملPlatelet-To-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of No-Reflow after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Introduction: No-reflow increases the complications and mortality rate of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, it is important to identify patients at a higher risk of developing no-reflow. This study aimed to systematically review the prognostic value of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) to predict no-reflow. Materials and Methods:</s...
متن کاملPercutaneous Coronary Intervention after Fibrinolysis for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), fibrinolysis and the combination of both methods are current therapeutic options for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Google scholar and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of PCI after fibrinolysis...
متن کاملCorrection: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention after Fibrinolysis for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141855.].
متن کاملMeta-analysis of randomized trials on access site selection for percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
INTRODUCTION Superior outcomes with transradial (TRPCI) versus transfemoral coronary intervention (TFPCI) in the setting of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have been suggested by earlier studies. However, this effect was not evident in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), suggesting a possible allocation bias in observational studies. Since important studies with hetero...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: European Heart Journal
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['2634-3916']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.1389